Christina Aguilera Shows Baby Bump in Marie Claire
Christina Aguilera is in all her pregnant glory in the new issue of Marie Claire.
She looks adorable adorable adorable!
Previous: Letizia Wears Penelope and Monica’s Design
Next: Mayra Veronica and Wilmer Valderrama’s Trip to Iraq



Brenda wrote:
So adorable and so Photo-Shopped…
I’m sorry but I don’t see the need for this display of her naked butt. Very poor taste!
11.28.2007 | 11:27 am | Link
Lindsay wrote:
I don’t like them .. algo tiene que se ve fea de la cara, media ho-ish…IDK
11.28.2007 | 12:18 pm | Link
Roxy wrote:
Love the cover, but the second picture I’m not so sure about.. yes the belly is adorable, but the picture overall I’m not too crazy about.. IDK either!
11.28.2007 | 12:25 pm | Link
la chismosa wrote:
I disagree. The pictures are not done in bad taste. There is nothing that you can see that you would not be able to see in a bathing suit. And about photoshop, come on we all know every single pic in the magazines are photoshopped.
El embarazo es algo muy bello and as women we should embrace and celebrate it.
11.28.2007 | 12:34 pm | Link
Cholera wrote:
Very true. we should embrace. congrats christina!
11.28.2007 | 1:11 pm | Link
B. wrote:
She’s beautiful but looks to “orange” in the cover. Hopefully it won’t look like that when I get my copy.
11.28.2007 | 1:36 pm | Link
LaNey wrote:
A perfect body..that’s for sure!!!
11.28.2007 | 4:42 pm | Link
Genny wrote:
I am with la chismosa…she is very right, these days what photo isn’t photoshop…do we need to remain some people that we are in the 21st century…so get with it! Oh and why complain about the second picture…some of us swear we have virgin eyes when we know pretty well that some female actresses have done worst and have looked worst whether it was for bad or good source which those pictures came from. Plus the only thought that women have the ability to creat, carry, nurture, and bring life to a baby…it PRICELESS! That is the one of many things God blessed us with…and it is very beautiful in every aspect. So Christina you look beautiful! and Congrats for the baby to be!
11.28.2007 | 5:07 pm | Link
Genny wrote:
I am with la chismosa…she is very right, these days what photo isn’t photoshop…do we need to remain some people that we are in the 21st century…so get with it! Oh and why complain about the second picture…some of us swear we have virgin eyes when we know pretty well that some female actresses have done worst and have looked worst whether it was for bad or good source which those pictures came from. Plus the only thought that women have the ability to creat, carry, nurture, and bring life to a baby…it is PRICELESS! and we should admire it very much. That is the one of many things God blessed us women with…and it is very beautiful in every aspect. So Christina you look beautiful! and Congrats for the baby to be!
11.28.2007 | 5:08 pm | Link
MexicanBOY wrote:
Another photoshoo glory!!…
There should be an award to the best photoshoped photo of the year!!!…
Which one would win the award?…
11.28.2007 | 9:20 pm | Link
Brenda wrote:
La chismosa and Jenny,
that’s exactly the problem : all the photos in magazines are photo-shopped and are sending the wrong message to all the teenage girls and women with “normal” bodies. We all know where that leads….besides, if the body of a pregnant woman is so beautiful, which it is, then why photo-shop it? Show nature in it’s natural form! I can already imagine millions of pregnant women looking at themselves in the mirror, upset and trying to figure out why they don’t look like “perfect” Christina.
Yes, the beauty of creating life should be celebrated, but it doesn’t have to be by posing nude on the cover of a magazine. And it doesn’t make it right just because some one already did it before.
11.28.2007 | 9:45 pm | Link
KNELA wrote:
Well one thing I have to say…I think I like Britneys’ pics better when she showed her bump…But Christina looks good too…
11.28.2007 | 10:07 pm | Link
Roxy wrote:
UUH MexicanBOY I think that is a great idea!! I’d have fun judging lol
11.28.2007 | 11:28 pm | Link
Genny wrote:
Brenda…you are very right, pregnant women should NATURALLY bare it…but it all comes down to the difference between celebrities and “us.” Why don’t we see that woman looking herself in the mirror in magazines? Because they are not important to the tabloids, they are not going to make them money, unless the magazine is some type of family or those parent magazines. Another reasons is because people don’t know who these “unknown” women are and could pretty much care less if they are barring it all or showering their belly in the picture. One more thing, these women we speak about are not celebrities like Ms. Christina in this magazine, second they might not have the “influences” she does, such as money, fame, glam, and so forth. All women we see in magazines have money, have paparazzi chasing after them, are highly requested by the tabloids who can’t wait to get the first pictures of a celebrity baby, or the picture of Brit with no underwear, and things like that. I guess it all depends on what type of magazine it is. So lets remind ourselves that this is Latin gossip and that we are bound to see pictures of “celebrities” doing kind things around the world, doing something just out of the question, or simply being pregnant and bearing it like Christina is in this picture. Even though it might seem kind of wired and just plain nasty to most people, we must remember that she is a celebrity and celebrities tend to do these kinds of things. But if we looked at it from the perspective of just being a pregnant women in the cover of this magazine…would it even be displayed and talked about on this website? I really don’t think so, so therefore, I guess me and la chismosa are simply looking at it on the fact that she is pregnant and that she will soon give birth to another life she is carrying within her. But we all have different opinions and we all are going to state them differently. I guess I am just thinking outside the box and in terms of what I always think of when I see any (whether it is a celebrity or not) pregnant women…pregnancy is just beautiful.
11.28.2007 | 11:59 pm | Link
Wonderer wrote:
porque no la pusieron de frente para que se vea bien samba….esta bien samba esta vieja
11.29.2007 | 11:06 am | Link
Nina wrote:
She looks adorable and pic is tasteful. I truly am surpirsed that JLO hasnt done a pic of her pregnancy yet. The time will come when commercials may include unkown pregnant women for some advertisement as Dove has done with older women bare-and gracefully covering bodies with their postion and hands, arms. And with larger sized women wearing panites But i must say, the larger sized women weren’t so large. Wonder if Christina has stretch marks around her belly? Some women apply cocao butter or Vit E daily and dont have them even after delivery. Good genes.
11.30.2007 | 3:14 am | Link
Nina wrote:
Another thing I am noticing. Most Celebrities are limiiting the weigth they gain while pregnant so they won’t take long to lose weight. When I was a nurse years and years ago, 25 pounds weight gain was the Max unless a women was underweight. Then they thought excess weight would cause complications. It is obvious that Christina is following that 25 pound rule. She is still slim except for belly, upper thighs and buttocks-which is natural. Heidi Klum said she also doesn’t allow herself to gain much weight either when pregnant. But those too thin women celebrities will have problems if they dont gain enough weight. Premature babies , etc.
11.30.2007 | 3:18 am | Link
camila wrote:
that pic looks kind of grose
11.30.2007 | 6:37 pm | Link
Top Ten Best Chismes of 2007 - Latin Gossip wrote:
[…] We also played ‘Is she or Isn’t she pregnant?‘ with Jennifer Lopez for months, but alas, she confirmed when could no longer hide the panza. Christina Aguilera was another who tried to hide it, but then modeled her bump so beautifully in Marie Claire. Others that had babies - Cristian Castro, Daniela Spanic. […]
01.01.2008 | 10:12 am | Link